Climate Change Net Zero Scam - How we are being taken for a ride.

The Climate Change Net Zero Scam - How we are being taken for a ride.

Citizens are being taken for fools over 'Climate Change' -

The biggest scam since the South Sea Bubble?

This short pin-point article should show you why the Climate Change excuse is being used to control people and the hypocrisy of the 'Green' policies threatening our future prosperity and freedom of movement:

The heritage vehicle movement creates £18 Billion for the UK treasury a year, taking away road fuels will kill that. That £18 billion was our Defence budget about 10 years ago. 

(We will lose not only historic vehicles which will be worthless museum pieces without access to fuels, but skills and jobs across a wide range of outlets.)

New Electric vehicle take-up and sales are not rising as hoped.

(Second hand electric vehicles are being dumped onto the used car market because people are seeing the pitfalls, mostly the charging cost, accessibility and lack of working chargers or the right type for their cars.

Electric vehicle ownership is now 1,000,000 as opposed to 34,000,000 Petrol and Diesel vehicles. With the 2030 'Ban' approaching in just over 6 years, the take-up is pitiful and by 2030 I doubt will be at 10%. 

This folly of pursuing these vehicles for general use is obvious, they do have a place in urban areas for short journeys but otherwise they are a failure.)

Untaxed Airlines taking off, blow out pollutant emissions back over 'Clean air zones' such as happens in London, Bristol, Birmingham where ULEZ zones are enforced - somewhat an own goal. 

(Each aircraft movement creates the same CO2 output as a family car driven 75,000 miles - equating to about 10 years of average driving of that car in just that one takeoff. 

Multiply that by the aircraft takeoff events happening at 90 second intervals for most of the day and that means around 30 events per hour across at least 12 hours a day for each airport meaning around 400 flights per day on a busy day.)  

Burning wet biomass culled from North American mature forests, then shipping the wood debris across the Atlantic in ships travelling 10 feet per Gallon of oil consumed and burning this wet wood, creates massive amounts of CO2 making one such 'Power Station' that burns Biomass the biggest sole CO2 polluter in the UK.

(Powdered Coal burned in Power Stations is more efficient and less net CO2 producing than wet biomass - We were told NOT to burn wet wood some years ago in woodburning stoves - which anyone with one of these, knows not to do. 

We have 300 years supply of high grade coal in Wales that is cleaner and greener than the Biomass alternative.

Culling mature trees in the USA means that there is a 30 year wait for replanted growth to equate in CO2 consumption what has been cut down. Sheer stupidity to think this is ecologically sound)

The world is an oil based economy and has been for over 100 years.

(Even electric vehicles use tyres made from 80% oil and the paint that Just stop oil vandals throw around is likely made from Oil, as are their banners. 

Oil has to be refined, as part of that process we get Natural Gas, Petrol Diesel, lubrication Oils and Grease and other products from this operation. Fuels are volatile and are hazardous to store and burning them is a way to use them.)

Electric vehicles are the future.

(In the 1900's America had a flourishing Electric Vehicle presence, it died a death because of the obvious limitations that exist today and because now as then, liquid fuels are more convenient and efficient.)

The reality is that if the developed countries shy away from Oil, other nations will not and continue to use it. Oil is not going to go away.

It is likely that the finite minerals needed for batteries will be gone before direct one for one replacement of today's vehicles will be achieved.

(Synthetic fuels have been made since the 1940's, only the prevalence of naturally occurring Oil and the fact it is cheap to exploit  have meant that synthetic, Green and Net Zero fuels which are possible and being made now have only just now become alternatives. 

We should be in no rush to dump or stop manufacturing internal combustion vehicles which CAN operate on synthetic fuels.)

Tyre debris causes ill health.

(The worst offenders are electric vehicles that wear tyres out far quicker, around every 2 years and these tyres are 80% Oil, the Tarmac used on our roads is also from Oil.)

Free energy has been available to the world since 1954.

(See Stephen Greer's work on this subject. We have the technology gained around 1954 to have moved away from Oil to free and clean energy. The USA which relies heavily on Oil would have lost its world advantage and considerable wealth by pursuing this path. Do the math as they say.)

Policies such as Net Zero and the cessation of production of Internal Combustion Engines has been engineered as part of a Transport Apartheid project to control personal transport and restrict movement. It will not stop nations including China, India or Russia from burning fossil fuels.

Adopting dates grabbed out of thin air of 2050, then 2036 and now 2030 as dates to 'ban' I.C.E engined vehicles are sheer folly. 

These 'statements' are being made without a credible solution either in place, without a realistic alternative being in place and often made by headline grabbing politicians and those with often very little technical idea of the problems to overcome or the practicalities.

Many scientists and leading industrialists have pointed out this obvious error.

Almost as big an error was the failure to unify the charging plug size and pin layout on electric vehicles and chargers before going down this 'green road'.

The bottom line is that the Sun creates our climate and China has a large industry controlling the weather though electronic and airborne chemical means. 

Such artificial 'influencing' of the climate means that any fluctuations or spikes in the weather can be 'conveniently' blamed on climate change when this is patently not the case.

Climate Change is the biggest scam since the South Sea Bubble fiasco in the 1700's.

It cannot explain why in the days when Jesus was around that Grapes could be grown in Britain, as they could also in the Tudor times, yet conversely how in the 1800's the climate was so cold that the River Thames was frozen solid for months in Winter.

More than 10,000 years ago there were no glaciers and Greenland was fertile green land not an icy enclave. We had an Ice Age. It is a phase. 

Sea levels are controlled by gravitational forces from the Moon which is moving away from the Earth by 12 inches a year. Less gravity force = less pressure on the water = water rising over time. Simple physics not 'Climate change'.

We are all being scared over this climate 'situation' and it is being exploited to control us. It all looks like a huge scam.

Just Stop Oil Activists will fail and are only alienating the public with their actions. The world is an Oil-based economy.

 

Just Stop Oil - are they on a road to nowhere?

The agenda of 'Activists' from the XR and Just Stop Oil camps is doomed to fail because they are only alienating the public with their actions.

Never mind the Rolex.... or the Aston, Bugatti, or Rolls Royce....

Childish vandalism with Orange paint and the politics of envy - won't wash in our democracy. Targeting a shop selling Rolex watches because they are a 'luxury item' serves only one purpose - the publicity that goes around the world from this 'toddler tantrum criminal damage' gives Rolex lots of free publicity worth thousands of pounds and increases sales.

Aston Martin, Bugatti et al whose showrooms have been similarly desecrated and damaged also get the wealth of free publicity and as a result of the tax gleaned from the sale of their luxury products, taxes are generated which often go to help the poorest and provide education, social care etc. for people who are often unable to access private education for example.

No place for 'anarchy in the UK' here

These 'Activists' have a right to their views as we live in a democracy, but they should exercise them at the ballot box, anarchy on the streets is straight out of the out of the hard left's 'class war' handbook from the 1917 Russian revolution, but we don't tolerate that sort of thing here.

This 'no future' rhetoric of some of these 'Activist' acolytes is childish babble of the indoctrinated and easily led, some of us lived through the Cold War and the Irish Troubles and with the threat at anytime of annihilation from nuclear weapons an ever present threat for over 45 years in our lives. 

We did not stop 'having a future' or living our lives. We got on with our lives. In my view, some of these followers are being groomed and indoctrinated into being scared. Anxiety is a new industry created to control and they are falling for it. Stalin used to refer to 'useless idiots' - draw your own conclusions here.

Vandalising artworks is not working either, nor will any intent to slash or damage them in the future. When these people get a criminal record, they may find in the near future that it stops them getting jobs or accessing services and will not be the badge of honour they think it is. When potential employers search social media and find their candidate's 'activism' handiwork on video, they may well think again about shortlisting them for a job.

Policing the rabble

The Police are quite able to enforce the law with regard to persons obstructing the public highway and move them on without any delay - as these 'activists' think this is their only way to get their message across lack of action is exploited and angers the public.

This 'Activism' is no ordinary protest and is a well established pattern of disruption that has been on-going for sometime. The Police are aware of the agenda behind this protest and should take swift and decisive action. 

The Police need to move these people on right away as soon as they encounter them. The public are losing patience with these individuals and it will not be long before someone is injured or killed if violence erupts - because the ordinary public are losing patience and any sympathy with these protestors. 

Those interfering with motor vehicles such as people that let down tyres are guilty of tampering with a motor vehicle, an offence that carries a maximum life sentence in prison, which they may not appreciate.Until they are sentenced.

The environmental joke

Yes, the people that let down 4x4 tyres, besides the criminal offences racked up, perhaps do not realise that to renew these vehicle tyres if damaged, entails new tyres being obtained and fitted  - these being Tyres that are made 80% from Oil.

The paint used in their childish daubings is likely Acrylic - most of which is obtained from - Oil.

Britain has reduced its C02 by 40% from 1990's levels - surely enough and more than others have done, so why do these 'Activists' choose a soft target like Britain which is and has done a lot to sort out its emissions, so why do they not go to the 'difficult' places like China or Russia to make a nuisance of themselves?

They likely won't go to China or Russia because of the way they treat protestors there, China is the place where the majority of emissions are happening. China is producing at least half of the world's emissions alone, figures suggest. Not Britain, a mere 1% on a good day.

While we are here, the CO2 in the atmosphere is 0.05% of the total gases yes, half of one percent. Did you know that?

Oil makes the world goes round - that is the reality

The reality is the world is an oil based economy. We can and should have been producing synthetic fuels for some years if we are genuinely looking to move away from fossil fuels, the technology is available for us to produce synthetic transport fuels to replace Petrol and Diesel that are CO2 Net Zero. Yes, you read that right. We can do that and now. 

Electric vehicles are largely a smokescreen - they produce more problems than they solve and are based on finite Battery ingredient resources - which China largely controls. The production of the batteries causes massive environmental damage for the benefits they produce and the batteries are a major fire hazard.

These vehicles are not the future - in the early 1900s there were battery and Petrol / Electric vehicles but they were soon made obsolete by the internal combustion engine. Face it, they haven't even unified the type of plug required to charge the batteries. A schoolboy error if ever there was one.

Although the EU has outlawed the sale of new fossil fuel engined vehicles in 2035 Germany has cleverly sought to amend the legislation. 

Porsche has developed a CO2 net zero Petrol that works in new and old vehicles ironically as a bi-product from the 'Green' industry, as such the German 2035 treaty 'allows' Germany to continue to sell Internal Combustion engined vehicles 'that can use other fuels' - such as their 'Green' Petrol for example. This fuel will also work in older cars too.

The "Green" power from Electricity is mostly produced from heating water to make steam to drive turbines. When Gas the majority fuel used to do this and the Nuclear power isn't enough for the demand, Diesel generators back that up. 

E10 Ethanol Petrol is not 'Green' - it does not perform as well as straight unleaded fuel and you can lose up to 120 miles range per tank full - more fuel to do the same? Ridiculous. Era added to Diesel as an additive also reduces the economy of larger diesel vehicles. Another bit of 'Green' lunacy.

An electric car battery lasts perhaps 6-7 years, the car costs half as much again as an equivalent Petrol or Diesel car and has to be scrapped as the battery can't be renewed. The 20 year life span of a Petrol or Diesel car with a clean burning engine produces less emissions than the 3 battery cars you will need to obtain parity of working life.

Oh and don't forget burning wet wood biomass that is 'Green' because it is renewable, it produces way more CO2 than the Coal it is supposed to replace. All the while the Biomass derived from cutting down CO2 processing trees in America, which are then chipped and shipped over the Atlantic to Britain by oil burning ship, burned wet, whilst it takes 10-20 years to replace the sacrificed trees is sheer lunacy. I have been saying this for sometime and suddenly people are waking up to this. At last.

The bottom line on the JSO 'activists'

The reality is that their actions are in some cases unlawful and by alienating the public, they are not gaining the support they crave - and they wonder why this is? 

It isn't rocket science - stopping ordinary citizens working or going about their lawful business is both unlawful and counter productive. The standing vehicles in jams or having to divert uses up more oil rather than less. Another own goal.

People are heartily fed up with the results of the actions of these 'entitled' few protestors and the 'Activists' far from gaining support from the public are generating resentment by 'going down the wrong road'. Indeed, they often themselves have CO2 footprints that are very large when you track their social media exploits and travels around the globe.

The Police need to take positive action for the safety of these 'Activists' before someone is badly injured or dies. 

I have no issue with legitimate protest that does not impede the progress or passage of people who wish to go about their lawful business. If they wish to change things, the ballot box is the place, not anarchic street protests.

However, it seems that these people are not content to stand at the side of the road to get their message across, they have to stand on it and cause damage. By doing this, they have crossed a line and as such sympathy to their cause is almost entirely lost along with the patience of the ordinary citizens who are inconvenienced..