Is the concept of a 'Planet of the Apes' scenario bullshit? What does anthropology tell us?

Darwinism, science has shown, needs revision 

Origin of species

The title of Darwin's work from 250 years ago.

Evolution is a theory of how 'we' got here, but look at the evidence - if we did 'come down from the trees and start walking upright,' then why have the primates other than what we became, not done likewise?

The reason is, because this is wrong.

Our 2nd pair of chromosomes are fused - this does not occur in nature

We may be around 90% similar in genetic material to a Chimpanzee, but there the similarity ends.

We are not the same animal, even the Anthropologists have to admit that the Chimpanzee 'build' could not have evolved into us.

We were seeded by off-planet superior humanoids -

Check out the  work of Zacariah Sitchin and Lloyd Pye on this

So, where do we come from?

Not here, totally. We come from off this planet in part, however firstly, we are descended from a Primate from Earth, but one that was 'terraformed' here - that is brought here and acclimatised to the planet.

Our current 'human' species is the third such version of 'humans', the previous incarnations two were destroyed by war.

We were created by the fusion of genetic material from technologically superior beings thousands of years ago with the 'base' Primate / hominid type of creature, terraformed on Earth, so we are technically an 'alien' species.

We can reproduce with these Primate entities - the famous Zana case in Russia is proof of that, but we CANNOT reproduce with a Chimpanzee.

The Chimpanzee is at 10% genetic variance, too far away from us genetically to work. Even some mountain Gorillas cannot interbreed, their 'close' genetic match is not close enough.

Our brain is highly advanced -

the Chimpanzee brain is nowhere near as advanced as ours after 18 months age

It's the brain that is the key. Or rather, language.

Humans exist in three simultaneous planes, the past, the present and the future when we use language.

Subconsciously, we 'model' what we speak, our brain is a 'wetware' super computer that builds scenarios and when we are speaking, later intentions and actions are all being modelled and tested at fantastic speed, unconsciously.

The statement 'I am going to the shop' you might say to someone, already builds the outcome that you might do this action, unless a change of circumstance happens and your reason for a trip to the shop is negated, like someone goes there for you.

Language is the driver that has built the human brain.

So bullshit or not?

Well, if we go by the scientific evidence, then the reality is that the film is just a film, fiction.

It never will be scientific fact.

The adult Chimpanzee has the same 'level of brain' as an 18 month old human child, the child advances over the primate when the child starts to talk and that develops the human's brain in spectacular fashion and leaves the Chimpanzee behind.

Going back to our original points on evolution, why have animals not really evolved much past their original 'job description?' -  again it is down to the brain.

We have language, a type of language that is unique and that is why we are different, our brains have been engineered to be different.

The reality is that we have been created by off-planet intervention and the book of Genesis shows us that, a work that drew on the earlier clay tablet inscriptions of the ancient Sumerians, many of which have been decoded by Zacariah Sitchin.

Humans are an 'intervention' species - we did not come from Chimpanzees, here are the facts why

The oft quoted mantra humans came down from the trees is complete bullshit

The Darwinian view was made using what information was available, 250 years ago.

So, some naturalists tell us we came from an evolution of the Chimpanzee that came down from the trees one day and decided to walk upright, that's crap. Laughable. Here's why.

The 'belief' by some that a primate just happened to stand upright and decide this was a better way to get around and we evolved forward to being as we are today is not true.

Chimpanzees are said to be our closest living relative, at 98% genetically the same. So is an Alligator similar at 92%, but do we scrub about on stubby limbs and have a hard leathery skin? A house fly has 20,000 genes, the Human 30,000. See the picture?

All living creatures share the basic genetic ingredients.

What the experts don't tell you is that the 8% difference is many millions of cells different. Because that doesn't suit them. Many also come out with this 'out of Africa' Afrocentric view, that is also not correct. Hominids started in the European area and moved TO Africa, not the reverse. 

People say we Monkey around?

Lets look at some facts about Chimps v Humans.

The Human-Primate genetic 'match' gap is too wide for parity and compatibility to be true

Chimps have 4 limbs all equal length for tree climbing, they haven't evolved that out.

Humans have arms shorter in relative terms to their legs.

Chimps have far better muscle strength, their bones are more dense and stronger.

Humans have less relative strength and have lighter skeletal structure.

The Pelvis of both is obviously different because the Human walks upright, the Chimp does not do so for long periods of time. It is not built to do so.

The rib cages are opposite shapes, the Chimp is larger at the top and is funnel shaped down, the Human's is smaller and funnels outwards as it goes downwards. That is not evolution explainable, they were different from the outset.

The Human has a pronounced neck

The Chimp as with other primates has a neck / shoulders unit by contrast

The human eyes are adapted for light. The Chimp for low light conditions as found in forests. 

The Chimp can live in the wild, humans have no thick body hair and need clothes to live outside.

The feet are different in relation to where the ankle locates relevant to the base of the foot area.

The Chimp has no chin like other familiar Primates, the Human does have a chin.

The Human skull has to accommodate a different shape brain.

The Cerebral Cortex of a Chimp is 4 times smaller if laid out flat than that of a Human.

The voicebox is different as it the vocal chord arrangement

Humans use a structured language, primates do not. This is to do with the frontal cortex development which then allows the left side of the brain's language engine to function and the interplay between the two allows a growth of intelligence and development.

The Human has the 2nd Chromosomal pair joined, the Chimp and other Primates do not. The 2nd Chromosome fusing can only have been achieved by external modification, it can not happen naturally or in nature.

Human and Primate brains are different, here's why

An adult Chimpanzee is only as intelligent as an 18 month old child, do you know why? You'd think that statement might be wrong and that the Chimpanzee would be more intelligent, but that is not the case and it is to do with the brain.

A scientist decided to map the Human v Chimpanzee brain to try and map the difference in the neurons in both brains, to ascertain what was 'missing' from the Chimp side.

The scientist should have been cogniscant that the two brains are not related. The exercise had little 'relative' value, because the 'relatives' were not 'relative.' Look at all the above differences to see why this is so. And, why has the Chimpanzee not evolved intellectually like us?

So, let's go back to our comparison. What is the truth? It comes down to language. At around 18 months, the Human child starts to talk, why then? It is all to do with brain development.

The frontal cortex of the human brain develops with age and continues to do so until around 22 years of age, when it is fully formed. (The neural connections with the language engine of the left side of the brain are part of the reason, along with the development of neural intelligence that we advance over the primates.)

The difference is language. When we use language, we have to operate in three simultaneous places at once. We have to 'visualise' the past, present and future when we use speech, to say 'I did this, I am doing this, I am going to do that.'

We have to 'model' scenarios unconsciously to enable us to speak, because we are formulating 'arguments' that illustrate our actions. So we are saying we did, will do and are doing, without consciously being aware that our brain is computing the outcomes in our 'mind's eye' as we are speaking. We are also subconsciously forward planning.

The Chimpanzee on the other hand does not have this type of 'wiring' to be able to do these functions and they have not 'evolved them' in the 8 million years since they were supposed to have come down from the trees. Why, if we have and are the 'relatives' been able to and they haven't?

The bottom line is to look at the human species and ask yourself why no other animal has evolved to the apparent level that humans have? Why are the rest of the animals etc still at the level pretty much where they came in? Why are Horses not in charge for instance, or Dolphins?

Because they have not evolved further much than when they started out. Look at our technology and advancements over the last 500 years. Why in nature therefore are we so different?

We are an intervention species pure and simple, we have been modified to be advanced. The questions are who did it and for what purpose and then where did 'they' come from?

Someone from off the planet. 

Perhaps they may return to see the result of their unfinished experiment! To see how it turned out, or maybe they already know. I'm sure they have been back.

The late Lloyd Pye who spent many years researching this subject

I would direct those of you interested in our true origins to check out the work of the late Lloyd Pye, who spent many years investigating the subject of our recent human origins.

I would also suggest you see Michael Cremo's work on Forbidden archaeology that examines artefacts that are at odds with 'science.'

Human 2.0, the next stage of the species - the human - trans human - robot interface arrives

Transhuman engineering could be the next mega industry to come

Is the human species at the zenith of its development? Is there room for improvement or another option?

The human species is different to anything else on the planet, why? because it is an intervention species. Our supposedly closest link is a chimpanzee but that is not a viable reality, because even at about 98% similar, the disparity in genetic connections runs into the millions and means that the two could never breed. Even the Bonobo and Chimpanzee with an identical 98 % match cannot breed with each other. Some Gorilla species which look near identical are not compatible to breed.

Note the 2nd human chromosome joined as a pair,

this does not occur in nature it can only be done by modification, externally.

Something did this to our species. Nature did not.

So the human as we are today is advanced, but unless we can progress to using 30% of our brains as someone on the genius level does, we are going to remain as we are.

That said, we cannot use more than that capacity because of the heat issues the brain activity would generate and also the amount of energy the brain would consume from the food we intake, might not be enough, so where next?

Our spirit is an ethereal situation, it is our consciousness,

we still are aware of it even if we leave our bodies in near-death situations

therefore it must be external to our brains

Our situation does have an alternative, that is a plug and play humanoid shell. Used as a carrier, the human brain could be incorporated into this adjunctive shell. If you have ever experienced a near death experience and left your earth body, you will know that you are able to have a conscious and aware functioning experience without your 'human chassis.'

Your 'human chassis' has enough of a basic operating system in the brain to keep the vital resources running constantly. We know this because we do not die when we fall asleep.

Therefore, the 'spirit' if you like, the coherent force of life we all have, can be 'read' by computers and the details downloaded, dreams can now be captured. So we can perhaps move to a situation where we create a synthetic human, that can have its parts renewed and then keep the spirit living almost infinitely.

Real Human Robots from the Swedish Television series 'Real Humans.'

These autonomous humans are human robots called  'Hubots.'

A small number were created as organic and hybrid human robots - essentially Human 2.0

To do this, we are then creating a new sub species of ourselves, a Human 2.0. By this method, we can if the 'standard' human is lost to a disaster, relaunch and be immune to most things, if the spirit is retained as an ethereal and non-biological entity, then the human 2.0 is almost in most terms, indestructible.

So what is this future human's future? It depends. The end game of the human as we know it changes as Human 2.0 becomes normal, no longer is it conditioned to a situation of reproduction to ensure survival of the species.

Whilst in theory it can enjoy the things we do now, will it need them? What about consumerism and possessions? Moving to an ethereal 'virtual' awareness model, much like a Google car autonomous unit, the 'entity' may be artificially aware as a computer can be, by receiving data from sensors, but it does not have 'human consciousness' which the spirit has.

Certainly a move away from the current human model, may mean that the new powerplant of the future for these entities might require an organic fuel supply. Therefore farming may change to accommodate this.

The 'identity' or the 'spirit' in this human 2.0 may move on further from this concept, it may use a small super mini computer, with fibre optic cabling to cut down on heat generation and as such it could create and use a virtual concept of reality. But this sort of misses the point about what it is to be human, to have that spirit. To be an individual and not another clone of another clone.

But essentially, this upgrade scenario is no different from taking a hard disk from one computer to another. It's just for humans, we can't do this yet. We don't have a donor chassis for the job ready made, unless a person who had been killed, was kept in animated suspension with vital life resources artificially kept going until a suitable live brain unit and head was attached.

Human 2.0 is way to release those who have paralysis of the limbs, once we can transition to a level of robotic reality of appearance and movement, the use of a human 'conscious' 'CPU' for want of a better phrase, offers genuine release and freedom. Essentially, this person is no longer trapped and waiting to die. Once re-engineered, it has life again, meaningful life.

With development, our current 'organic' model human could be replaced by another 'organic' humanoid, which may have recyclable parts or self-renewing parts, derived from an organic situation, fuel and regeneration capability. Just instead of being as we are, we can be regrown by computerised 3D printing, 'self mapping.'

We have to ask ourselves, what quality of life we really want in the future, how long as individuals do we really want to live? what is our purpose in life and do we have a future?

The Human 2.0 is like the autonomous robot of tomorrow, it is up for discussion and the discussion needs to be had right now.

The Human Race or Species has to decide where it is going in the future, the current consumer society driven model is no longer viable.

The human of tomorrow has to be business like, it needs some purpose and objective, it needs more than junk television and fast food to fill its time.