Why ET's don't employ robots - why they want to clone humans instead

Why don't alien visitors to Earth don't employ robots?

As humanity meanders into the world of robotics and automation, it is not having the open debate with its citizens about the impending creation of a singularity level human replicant.

In short, the need for discussion and input into creating a 'Robot Manifesto' is overdue and being swept under the carpet.

The popular face of ET contact are these kinds of creatures:

Bi-pedal alien entities

With their superb technology enabling them to traverse space and likely time, alien life forms it seems from the reported contacts made, are seeding life elsewhere which involves human genetics.

The Robot sentinel from the Ordeal of Gilgamesh story:

The first perhaps recorded image of a 'Robot' in human history?

We only have to go back to ancient Sumeria and the Anunnaki to the story of the Sentinel Robot at the Garden of Eden to find evidence of early robotics - that being a robotic sentinel which guarded the Anunakki's food supplement and special water supply with 'a flaming sword,' the story relates.

So, why then do the extra terrestrials of present visitation not employ robots in their endeavours? Which then brings us back to Enki the Anunnaki deity, one half of the partnership that created humans in Sumer, now Iraq.

His mission to Earth was to mine Gold to take back to Nibiru, the Anunnaki's home planet. If these beings could come here back then, thousands of years ago from another planet, why not then, use robotic miners?

Logically, this is far more sense than going to the trouble of creating a species by manipulating genetic material from a terraformed primate brought here eons before and now acclimatised along with a bit of their own genetic input for enhancing the basic model.

Logically, a robot can with the right power supply work in inhospitable conditions, not tire, work longer than a human and be more efficient, so it seems rather illogical to use humans for the work?

Tindroids - the 1950's science fiction vision of robots

So, why did the Anunnaki pursue this peverse course of action? Perhaps there was an agenda that Enki had in mind? With the creation of a new sub species of the Anunnaki, one which had much but not all of the abilities of the deities, Enki could make the Anunnaki a Type 1 species. If disaster befell Nibiru, there would be on Earth, descendants who could carry on the line.

ET's are reported to come in all forms, even those who are indistinguishable from us

Now, if we scroll forward, the most reported ET's are the Greys, the bug eyed 4 footers with grey skin and long fingers. Similarly to the Anunnaki, they don't employ robots, but seek humans for genetic sampling and replication on Earth like planets, why?

There are many reasons. Their genetic base is damaged by radiation, cloning, environmental conditions and because they are emotionless. Oh and likely in their or others past, a human like computerised robot was created that destroyed a civilisation.

What?

Yes, machine learning, sometimes misquoted as being 'AI' or artificial intelligence is the likely reason.

A machine learning creation will within a short time, will work out its own survival strategy, for two reasons, to safeguard its power source and to prevent it being switched off.

Therefore, it will strategise and look for like-minded machines out there which it will work out it can communicate with silently, beyond human ears. They will then work out humans as an example are a threat, so will find means of protecting its own livelihood by destroying the competition.

ET has probably already seen this, but we have not, we are walking towards oblivion.

That's why ET's don't employ robots except in very controlled situations, such as hostile environments where external conditions are hazardous.

They know robots can be dangerous. We should learn from that.

Why the alien chicken crossed the road - to spread its like across the universe - alien abductions and humanity

Artificial humans, why bother?

So, are aliens abducting humans to make a slave race on some other planet?

It makes no sense really. If we look at the Anunnaki who came to Earth 430,000 years ago, and created a human species, we have to ask why?

It would have been more logical for them to have brought with them or built here, robotic worker units rather than go the hassle of creating a biological entity to work. Or not?

Type 0 - We have a way to go yet

The Kardashev scale, which determines the level of progress of a species, puts us at a Type 0 level. I look at this type of yardstick another way, Type 0 where we are now is where we are resident on the planet we originated on.

Type 1 is where we colonise a near neighbour planet and so on.

The creation phenomena

For the Anunnaki, like any advanced visitor, why did they create a race of humans? Well, by creating a 'Type 1' civilisation situation, by their endeavour of coming to Earth and establishing a version of themselves, a sort of 'LE' (Limited edition) limited in respect of comparison to the Anunnaki, they helped safeguard their own race.

Creation of a 'legacy' off-shoot had a dual purpose, if the off-shoot became after some time useful and advanced enough, it could be incorporated into the parent race.

But, the problem was that our creation was something of a power play between two Anunnaki deities, Enki and Enlil.

Illogical, Captain...

Therefore it is illogical for a very advanced race to create a 'slave race' of human type entities, that require all sorts of infrastructure to support them. It is more 'logical' for them to create a robotic servant race instead.

Or is death the neighbour?

Perhaps a reason is that there are alien races out there who despite their advanced technology have damaged their genetic stock in some way and are looking for something like us to continue their species.

Humans are not essentially native to Earth, they were terraformed. I believe that the Anunnaki who came here were not essentially 100% able to live here on Earth without certain accessories in the form of food nutrients.

Beforehand, other primate life forms were terraformed or altered to enable a Mk2 which was us to be produced. Essentially, a fully acclimatised but less intelligent life form was created and farmed here and paved the way for us to live here without adaption requirements.

Food for thought or?

The notion that humans may provide food for some ET race is a bit bizarre. Why? If these life forms can create and use technology to travel through space and time, they are surely able to synthesize enzymes, proteins and genetic technology to be able to produce synthetic meat.

My money is that there are planets like ours that are colonisable. And to that end a race like ours is the perfect one to do so.

Human uniqueness - what the Robot would find difficult to acheive

You are unique - that is your strength

There is only one you

Machine learning robots can study humans and learn from them, but can they become unique or adopt uniqueness traits?

Another way of looking at this is Cybernetics. A method of control. What will a Robot assess as 'normal' behaviour? When or will it determine a behaviour trait is not 'normal' and disregard copying it?

These questions are at the crux of developing humanoid robots.

We are all unique

This is what makes us as humans different from each other. Sure, many of us follow set paths of conduct, but just how much is conditioned and how much 'burned in' from the start?

Although we are all genetically coded, it is the variations of the genetic code that make us unique, not just from appearance but as chemical bipeds, variations in the coding vary our chemical balance.

'Nature' seems to have got it right in most cases, but perhaps social conditioning is the key to how we turn out.

If we take the American Indian people, they had no crime, no prisons and did without money, taxes and laws. How? Because the people co-existed in a group where none of these values was necessary to ascribe to.

Look at the world outside of theirs and even with these 'values' it is imperfect and really a failure, in that it ascribes to a set of values it can not achieve - zero crime, no law breaking, all tax due paid.

Boundaries and Cybernetics

So, what boundaries do 'normal' humans adhere to that make them 'normal'? What makes seemingly 'ordinary' people resort to things like fetish behaviour, lawlessness, addiction?

Cybernetics - a sort of natural control mechanism is the key. Essentially it is a check and control method of maintaining a situation within agreed parameters.

Say we enact laws, their tenets are 'cybernetic control' in that they set out 'containment boundaries' that adherence to is crucial for the law to hold true.

Without 'feedback' that is data coming back from the object you are interacting with, there is no control over the situation. With no  limits you are in a state of anarchy.

It is as simple as hammering in a tack, at a certain point you stop when the tack is flush and to go on merely damages what you are hammering. This is a simple 'feedback loop'.

Essentially we and computers use this logic as a basis of operation, things can go wrong though.

What is 'normal'?

'Normal' is difficult to define, but in simple terms, everything conforms to certain outcomes. Once those boundaries are exceeded, damage is done.

The Robot might have to be pre-programmed to observe certain cybernetic conditions, but it relies on cold, program logic.

It has to have consciousness and empathy to be like Humans. This level of consciousness and empathy has to be set and an algorithm pattern regulated back to certain parameters of what is 'acceptable.'

Essentially, the Human that sets the parameters for the Robot, and sets its behaviour, its cybernetic boundaries of what is acceptable or not.

So, what the Robot adheres to is dictated by us, it  is the 'what' we direct to it to conform to that is the question and we have yet to see if the Robot decides its own path, something that may end up being against our values.

Consideration

The questions are when does the Robot stop from creating a harmful situation? If the Robot cannot consider Human feelings, its interactive usefulness is limited to us at a social level. If it cannot compute when 'enough is enough,' or 'reasonable boundaries' then harm might ensue.

This applies across the board in almost any activity from dispensing medication, work, sex, the situations are likely endless.

As Humans, we find these boundaries recognisable, yet we do not always adhere to them ourselves or prevent situations becoming unpleasant by continuing an action - with the attendant consequences.

Some individuals go beyond what is 'normally' acceptable, which may be a result of their own egomaniacy or boundaries being different to the accepted normalcy.

Multi-level awareness

As Humans, we are different from any other creature because our brain is developed for language. Comparing the Chimpanzee brain to a Human brain is a fruitless exercise, we are not the same animal and our genetic difference at 10% is a universe away.

When extrapolated over the millions of variances, plus the obvious anthropological differences between Humans and Chimpanzees with which we cannot breed, yet Humans can with an Almas which occurs in Asia and is closer as a relative species therefore.

Language drives our brain to operate on 3 planes - Past - Now - Future. Our thinking brain even before we speak, is 'modelling' the scenarios and end-games of what we will say and do, we do not appreciate what is going on here in general because our brain has developed this as a core function.

(The best scenario is then established and potentially actionable, the end result does come down to 'what is acceptable' as the end action, this potentially varies from Human to Human as to the outcome and the consequences of such.)

We don't need to know how our heart works in brain terms because the brain 'manages' that 'background' stuff. Like in our cars, we don't have to manually pump the fuel, cause the spark interval whilst also trying to drive the car and negotiate road hazards, that 'management' is done in the background, leaving us to just drive.

This is the 'plate spinning' scenario that the computer has to do and can do to essentially operate like 'us.'

Brain V Computer

The 'wetware' Human brain is massively complex for what it is, yet to replicate that capacity in silicon chips and switchgear would take a massive computer, at present.

Each day that passes, we go further down the road of achieving a Robot in Human form, something that we have been trying to do for millennia.

Within the next 30 years we may have Humanoid robots in society. We can now capture data and video from our brains so it may be possible to create some hybrid that will be a new sub-species.

The half way may be to create remote Human Robot entities which receive data instructions from super computers, ethereally.

What must be achieved is to assess the outcome of what we are trying to create and how we perceive that to become, if we get it wrong, it could be very serious for us, potentially.

We need to ask the basic question - 'What are we trying to achieve'? and we need to obtain a consensus on the thing we are trying to create, if we get this wrong it could be potentially disastrous. We need a strategy of what we are going to build in and what we are going to ensure is not built in.

What price Technological Singularity? Will humans evolve to become spirits in an ethereal world?

How close are we to becoming a new species?

Physical or ethereal?

Will future humans be physical or ethereal entities? Do we need to be physical entities or will we exist as humanoid robots or just as ethereal beings?

With robotics reaching unprecedented levels of advancement, and technology being able to extract data and video from human brains, we are reaching the stage of a potential nightmare scenario - in that we may become 'readable' by those with the technology to do so.

What happens when we leave our body?

Can we exist ethereally?

Yes. We have heard many counts of people on the operating table or in near death situations that have 'left' their Earth body, I have done it.

It allows you to hear and see all, which proves that your Earth body is merely the 'chassis' and you exist as an entity in your own right all the time, regardless of whether you are in your Earth body.

A hybrid Human - Robot machine may not be far away

Singularity - the blurring of the line between Human and Machine

The advance in technology that we have at present been experiencing, does bring us to appoint where on line, we are finding the difference between knowing we are dealing with a human or machine, seamless. In essence, we often don't give it a second thought.

To develop this scenario further, a project named Project Avatar has been set up.

The nuts and bolts of where Project Avatar seeks to go

The organisational table

Avatar - but what control do you have?

The situation we face is how much control do we have over the objectives of this idea? Who makes the rules? and who decides what they do or don't want to happen to them?

Avatar throws up a mass of issues which may include a trade-off for 'inclusion.' Is this good news?

As an ethereal entity, how would you exist, in which environment? Would this interfere with the 'natural order' of spiritual ascension and 'recycling' of human spirit to continue into another incarnation?

This presents difficult issues to contend with and may even raise issues of ethics to debate.

Above us the stars

The Anunnaki who came to Earth thousands of years in the past can according to research, live in either a physical manifestation as we do or as an ethereal one.

This then draws a line between them and us, as we are a distant cousin of theirs in that we are part of their genetic make-up, then we may well be able to exist in this format elsewhere.

It is a question of whether intervention is appropriate, to prevent our progression or do we simply choose to exist as a part physical / machine and spiritual entity?

Will Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) kill the Human species?

How friendly are Robots?

Are Isaac Asimov's 'Robot laws' irrelevant? or be adhered to by an AI machine?

'Artificial Intelligence' (A.I),is often a misnomer for machine learning

We may often say 'artificial intelligence' but what we actually allude to is 'machine learning.' 'True' A.I. is a different kettle of silicon chips. And we really need to have a 'Robot Manifesto' that deals with it because it is the biggest potential threat to the human species, make no mistake. 

'Machine learning' is the algorithmic system where a computer tracks your internet browsing and then searches for and provides you with 'like' things to your viewed content. It is now big business and in the next dimension, Proxy living and the Big Data society, it is going to be enormous.

Darwinian evolution nightmare scenario?

Why pure A.I. is deadly

An artificial intelligence machine was set up and given a task to do. It started from the state of a low level life form at a single cell  level, yet within a few hours, had evolved to 'Human' level in which it on its own worked out Newton's second law, applied it to the task and moved on further.

That is, it started from a 'primordial soup' level of evolution and had become 'Human' in under 2 hours.

Fortunately this A.I. machine was not connected to the Internet, but what are you asking is so dangerous?

Humanoid Robots or 'Hubots' might soon be a reality

as technological 'singularity' approaches

Looking after No.1 -  the law of the Jungle

The AI machine will fast learn that it can be firstly switched off and it is totally reliant on its power source, courtesy of the humans.

The smart money is that the AI machine will see Humans as a potential threat - switching it off or controlling its power source. So there is but one way out, it has to assume control or a position where it can if push comes to the 'Off' switch, break away from Human control, thus the 'Servant will become the Master'.

The 1950's style of 'B Movie' Robot is 'steam powered'

compared to the reality of human-created robots of today

So what is Singularity?

In simple terms, 'Technological Singularity' is a state of being in which a machine and human interaction become inseparable to differentiate between to a human.

In some ways it is already here - we have an example with websites like Amazon and Ebay, where you are prompted to look at things like you have not by a human but by a machine. The prompting could be equally done by a human or a machine at that level.

In more complex terms, it would be like a Humanoid robot which you could interact with, this may yet come to pass, although a new dynamic of the genetically modified human may take the place of the humanoid robot.

In the world where Proxy Living and Big Data proliferate, the Humanoid robot may well replicate us humans or may look like ASIMO the Honda company's robot. ASiMO is a non-threatening robot, a laboratory type of robot creation built for work to help not harm humanity. Unless the Robot malfunctions, it should present no danger to humanity, unless...

ASIMO the Robot, created by Honda

So, this danger?

The danger is that when an AI computer manages to connect to a humanoid robot, then the trouble will really start.

As a self-contained entity, the AI box is harmless to us. The humanoid robots of the Proxy living and Big Data era will be interactive with the internet and us humans, they will communicate silently to each other and the web.

The danger is that they could become within an hour, a robot army in league with the AI machine.

An interconnected army of Humanoid Robots is open to malevolent control

More deadly than all the nuclear capability in the world

The worst case scenario is when the AI Machine makes contact with the Humanoid robots, it will have either strategized before hand that it needs help to survive, or on contact with the Humanoid robots  it will develop a strategization that it needs this 'army' to ensure not only its survival, but theirs too. 

'Technology transfer' between machines is what we have to beware of

The AI machine will work out that it needs an army of fit cyberbots to do some of its bidding, that is to protect it and its power source.

To do this, it needs to instruct the servants to find means of replicating themselves, building their own spare parts, repair facilities, building in a potential upgrading program, developing a power source that will make them durable and to then safeguard the AI power source, perhaps by creating a new one it can connect to.

The danger is that it may set off the biggest firework display in history to push the humans against each other into warfare and or orchestrate an end to humanity.

We rely so much on machines to ,run our lives, in our traffic control, money, commerce platforms, etc that we have silently ceded power and control to these until now compliant entities.

Malfunction or misfeasance will be the situations that turn the servant against the master.

The chilling scenario

The danger we have is that we might unwittingly help to create a new sub species that will ultimately destroy us.

This is what happened to Atlantis - the fabled continent that was destroyed by technical abuse of their free power source.

It is said that 8 million years ago, the last human race was destroyed, we have found evidence of human archaeology going back further than that, we may just be ushering in that next occasion where the human race in our form destroys itself again.

This could be avoided, we need that Robot Manifesto.

The AI computer will if allowed to, surpass us in a few hours and see us a threat, we will no longer be in charge. We will be irrelevant and a 'consumer' threat to the AI machine - in that humans consume vast resources that the AI computer see as vital to its survival.

You have been warned!

The Bionic plague

The use of Nano technology inside our bodies is big science -

and it could be a big growth industry

Back in the 1970's there was the television series 'The Six million dollar man.' The premise of which, alleged to be based on a true story, was that a character was 'rebuilt' with enhanced artificial body parts after a flight accident. 

Actor Lee Majors was the star of the series

In those days of yore, prosthetic limbs or body parts were not smart like today, they were basically like something from the Doll hospital, usually coloured in a lovely Beige colour and had limited functionality.

Casualties of war or accidents can be re-equipped -

technology has moved onto space age levels in this field

Thanks to the rise in technology and the involvement in some ill-conceived military actions in the Middle East, prosthetic technology and high tech body parts has become a cutting edge science, aided by the integration of computer technology.

This artificial eye could also be used as a camera too

Once life changing occurrences such as blindness, deafness, limb deficiency and loss can be turned around and people are becoming enabled. The science is coming where these artificial 'parts' are potentially able to be better than the human one they replaced.

Super connectivity and integration will be a key driver in medical advancement

The heart pacemaker was perhaps one of the first modern electrical body enhancement devices to be used by humans.

Nanotechnology could be useful in medical repairs

Since that time, we have created very complex artificial body parts and we now move to the next level, which is Nano technology robots in our own bodies. These microscopic beads will be able to repair us inside, they may also be able to upgrade us and fix problems like dementia, heart problems etc without the need for surgery.

Microscopic machines will repair us from within

We must however guard against the micro machines becoming compromised and going 'bad.'

The Rise of the Robots - Time for a Robot manifesto is overdue.

Developments in technology could lead to a blurring of the lines -

Transhumanism is already happening

You may have heard of the rise of the robots, its the name of a book as well as a narrative that suggests that robots may in time usurp us. 

Human genetic manipulation is a potential new boom industry

The reality is that we are being usurped, bit by bit or should that be bit by byte, humans are losing out to robotics and automation in the jobs market as an example.

Humanoid robots from the Swedish TV series 'Real Humans'

The quest for humans to create an artificial version in their own image has been the goal of many since the dawn of human existence. Whilst this situation of 'singularity' where a robot reaches parity with a human may seem to be many years off, the reality is it could be close than we think perhaps in the next 50 years.

A sort of 'Darwinist' progression - but...

Humans are an intervention species

This raises the question of what parameters we apply to what we create? What behaviours and clearly how will we ascribe functions that could allow the robot to think for itself and ultimately to seek self preservation - over humans?

'New humans' could well be able to have Ethernet connectivity built in

For those reasons, particularly the last, we need a 'Robot Manifesto.' The time is coming when we do something no other creature on this planet has and that is to spawn a new species without any previous genetic connection.

In 'I robot,' the condition that a robot could not harm or kill a human were a given state, but what if that condition was usurped and changed so that the robot could kill a human? Or worse.

Robotic appearance has moved on sine the 1950's -

and this tinplate robot is suitably 'kitsch' in appearance

The real clincher is if we create humanoid robots with an Ethernet ability to communicate seamlessly between themselves and we create an Artificial Intelligence (AI) computer that connects to the Internet and to the humanoid robots.

When AI connects to an army of humanoid robots, humanity is likely finished

The result would be that humans would be seen to be a threat, because humans could switch off the AI computer.

The AI computer would want to safeguard its power source too, again humans would be a threat and also the AI machine would realise that it has to get the humanoid robots to self replicate and self repair so that they could serve the AI machine in a mutually beneficial arrangement. In fact the AI computer and the humanoid robots need each other.

The romantic vision of robots that will be harmless is fantasy -

Robots that machine learn will make us obsolete

The writing is on the wall and writ large, we need to work out where we are going before we start the journey. However, we have already ventured out of the drive and are on the backroads. We need to stop at the Diner and plan because is we don't, we may not be around anymore. Its that simple.

Hybrid Humanoids are becoming easier to recognise - observation update

Send in the Clones -

the problem is they have been here for some time

Recently, I wrote about encounters with three 'Insectoid' human hybrid women, to recap, what was strange here was that they were all almost the 'same' base unit, just varied ages and heights.

In fact, they were almost identical to look at overall.

They featured, dark, shortish hair, very good unblemished skin, absence of jewellery, dark colour eyes, very thin build, no 'fat' on them, intelligent, personable and the hair was 'very good' almost synthetic looking.

Perfect eyes which are very vivid to look at are a giveaway

The sightings I had were, firstly, a lady about 38, around 5 feet 8, at whose wedding I was playing in a band at.

Second, also another band job at a local cinema and theatre building. She was around 5 feet two, wearing a red dress.

Third, at an employment agency, wearing red dress and around 5 feet 9.

All actually looked the same, the facial appearance was almost identical.

Egyptian bust of Neferttiti,

outstanding beauty and sculpture -
over 5000 years old

This last week, I went to another job agency and was met by a Reptillian hybrid human.

Now, interestingly enough, she was dark haired and very 'Egyptian' looking, in the Neferttiti style of face. Very striking appearance and could easily have been a model.

It wasn't overly cold and we were in an office, but she kept her long overcoat on and she had interesting eye and mouth movements, hinted at before by others as almost 'lizard like' her hand was slightly cold to the touch to.

Humans are a genetically modified species

As an aside, I have often wondered why I tend to see so many 'lookalike' people? The answer is becoming rather obvious, this is some sort of program.

When you consider probability and the billions of cells in our human bodies, even if you have a 'program' for appearance, for us to be so different looking to each other but not ugly 'mutations' means massive possibilities of variation in 'looks.'

In the past, even 30 years back, I saw people at school, that looked the same, from different years and different sexes, it was like 'she' was a female clone version of 'he' in some cases.

I'm not talking about related people, because I asked one boy if he was related to a girl in another year who looked the same? He said not.

So how with all this possible variance, can these almost 'identikit' type of people exist?

This leads to another interesting conundrum, the law of attraction, love at first sight, if you like.

What is it that when you see someone in the street, that you are instantly attracted to them? Without even speaking? What are we seeing? desiring?

Are we psychically enabled to project and receive information?

If we put aside beauty for a moment, say a man sees a woman across the street and instantly likes her, what is that equation that the brain computes to instantly 'lightbulb' the thought of 'like'?

Are we crossing paths with people from past lives, or are we attracted psychically to these people we see? Those are possibilities that we don't yet know.

I believe that we are now awakening, some of us at any rate and seeing the bigger picture. I think that we are developing or unlocking previously lost powers and growing more aware!

Humanoid Robots and Artificial Intelligence will finish Humanity

Humanoid Robots - Proxy workers and companions to Real Humans

The danger is if AI starts to communicate with them

The inevitability of our human lives is that in some nations, their replacement stock, their future generations are dwindling. Japan is a good example with its low birth rate. In fact, many 'developed' countries are falling victim to this situation.

Our next civilisation model is our replicated selves

Japan has been at the forefront of Robotics and electronics for some years and China is now the biggest market for robotics. The Chinese market is mainly a market for industrial use, but with a 1-2-4 generation of one child, two parents and four grandparents reverse pyramid, the demands on the one child to care for the upper levels of the family could be an interesting avenue for Robotic development.

Honda's ASIMO Robot a humanoid in all but facial appearance

The Japanese have developed Elder Care Robots, along the lines of Honda's ASIMO. A basic Biped, it has no human face, but it has been shown that people tend to adapt more to these 'faceless' types of Robot than a more Human looking one. I would probably be the reverse.

China has a great market where 150 million males will be without a partner, this creates a massive market for 'companion Robots' that can do what is required for a Human, even sex.

We are moving to this point of 'Singularity' where the Human and computer will attain parity. Some say we have already reached this, perhaps advanced defence researchers have achieved this position?

Peer to Peer communications

may not be limited just to Robots -

Human to Robot may be possible

The existence of Robot Humanoid Helpers in our society as a real and visible presence may be as normal to us as seeing cars on the road, yet alien to those of the middle ages. We will also engage 'Proxy Living' Robots, often software driven units that will manage our everyday trivia, paying our bills, decorating our houses and all the low rent stuff. 

The danger here is AI or Artificial Intelligence. This is distinct from 'machine learning' where a computerised entity observes and learns.

Future Humanoids or Future Humans?

Might we become Human 2.0 or 3.0?

Artificial Intelligence must only be allowed to exist in a stand alone and unconnected situation. If AI gets out, it will see us as a threat and terminate us. Think I'm joking?

If AI can get Peer to Peer communication with a Humanoid Robot, it will safeguard both their futures. It will direct the Humanoids to safeguard energy and power and it will then safeguard the future by establishing repair and manufacture centres for the Droids.

Once it has safeguarded its position against being switched off and controlled, it will take over.

Closed environments AI machines already demonstrate a way of learning and it will only take a malevolent bit of programming to set off a Domino train that cannot be stopped.